But that's where "possible" diverges from "feasible" and "advisable." As fewer and fewer users continue to maintain standalone vaults, the cost/benefit ratio of such a large undertaking just stop making sense the number of users who would even potentially be able to make use of this continues to shrink, and those who would actively WANT such a thing is an even smaller number, especially when there is already a perfectly-serviceable extension to accompany the native app for local vault support. Possibly it couldn't be done by modifying the existing codebase, but given enough time and resources (specifically, developer hours), we could likely accomplish it one way or another. There isn't much we can't do that doesn't violate the laws of physics or the rules of the OSes for which we develop. We can't just re-use the code from the existing 1Password mini in 1Password 7 for Mac, and neither 1Password for Mac nor 1Password X knows how to behave as server.Ĭould it be done? Of course, eventually. Creating code to allow syncing of 1Password X with local vaults would be a non-trivial amount of work, to put it mildly. The extension itself is more or less a dumb conduit for the mini). 1Password X has no code to support syncing to 1Password for Mac, and 1Password for Mac has no code to support syncing to an extension (the extension you see in Safari, for example, has no UI of its own what you see is the 1Password mini. The underlying issue here is that both 1Password X and 1Password for Mac are essentially clients they understand how to talk to the server and exchange information that way (server - client model). If it were just that, things might be easier indeed. I know part of the reason is that the desktop extension uses 1Password Mini, and 1Password X has its own interface, but that is the only issue I can think of. And that issue can be simply resolved by either a) requiring the user to use the 1Password X interface, or b) adding an option for supported platforms to use 1Password Mini (which I would definitely use, I love the new mini!). I understand that 1Password X is meant to work on any platform/browser with accounts, and that its main benefit is that it works without needing a native app, but why can't it also support local vaults and all the features that the existing desktop extension does on supported platforms? I guess what I'm saying is, in other words, why aren't the two extensions merged? One question I have is, why can't 1Password X fully replace the desktop browser extension? I can't see any reason why it should be unable to access local vaults on platforms that have the native app installed this is a regression from the existing desktop extension (this beta might be starting to fix this at least for unlocking?). Hi for the explanation, I had been confused too. And in that situation, it could even replace the regular (desktop app required) extension (currently at 4.7.3.90).Īnyway, hope that answers your questions, but feel free to ask any follow-ups you might have, and let us know what you think re: 1Password X if you decide to give it a whirl! :) This is very much a beta feature at present, and obviously this won't work if you're still using standalone vaults.but if you're using accounts/vaults, it's pretty awesome. However, if you're using 1Password for Mac or 1Password for Windows, you can still use 1Password X as long as your data is in a account - and now, 1Password X can interact with the local Windows or Mac 1Password app as well, (un)locking each other when you unlock one. So it works on Linux, on Solaris, nearly anywhere you can install Chrome. It's pretty great if you've got all your data in a account, since you're now restricted only by what browsers you can install (Chrome and Firefox, as well as some Chrome derivatives like Brave and Vivaldi, are supported). 1Password X is our newest browser extension that works directly with a account and doesn't even require a standalone 1Password app like 1Password 7 for Mac or 1Password 7 for Windows in order to function. Hey and Thanks for the question and sorry for any confusion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |